《此间的少年》案使得停止侵害救济措施在著作权法上的适用限制再次成为学界关注的问题。停止侵害救济措施在著作权法上的适用限制，或称著作权领域内“‘侵权不停止’规则”的适用，作为著作权法领域对原则性侵权责任承担方式的突破，其正当性有待进一步确认，其适用方式亦有待进一步梳理。本文的论证以适用“侵权不停止”规则的“必要性-正当性-实践现状-规则架构”为思路展开。首先，结合著作权领域二创作品的发展现状及困境，从现实层面分析在著作权法领域当然适用停止侵害救济措施的所存在的负面影响，并进一步在理论层面探讨停止侵害救济措施的局限性及其与著作权侵权案件可能存在的不匹配性。其次，结合著作权法中与“侵权不停止”规则存在相似性的合理使用规则和法定许可规则，在理论层面剖析上述规则的异同，得出“侵权不停止”规则的正当性在于个案中的利益平衡的结论，并进一步对适用“侵权不停止”规则可能纵容更严重的著作权侵权行为的质疑做出回复。再次，本文整理了国内外适用“侵权不停止”规则的一系列实践，并总结出该规则适用的共性特征有二：以利益平衡为正当性依据；与替代性救济措施存在一定的绑定关系。上述共性特征与前文对该规则正当性的探讨形成现实与理论的呼应，也为后文即将提出的规则架构提供了方向。最后，本文尝试为“侵权不停止”规则的适用提出规则架构，并提出“阶段论”设想。“阶段论”主张将“侵权不停止”规则的适用分为两阶段，在第一阶段以利益平衡原则作为适用该规则的前置条件，在第二阶段则主要考虑替代性救济措施的适用问题，其中利益平衡的考量应将社会公共利益放在优先地位。对“侵权不停止”规则的有效适用，将更有利于兼顾和保护多方利益平衡。

As the result of the second trial of the Youth (CiJian De ShaoNian) case became public, the restrictions on the cessation of infringement in copyright law once again became an issue of concern in the academic community. As a breakthrough in the modalities of liability in tort in the field of copyright law, the legitimacy of the application of the rule of "no cessation of infringement" in the field of copyright law needs to be further confirmed, and the way of its application also needs to be further sorted out. This essay is based on the reasoning of “necessity - legitimacy - current practice – structure of the rule” for the application of the “ no cessation of infringement ” rule. Firstly, in light of the current dilemmas of the secondary works, this artical analyses the negative impacts of applying the cessation of infringement in the field of copyright law. Secondly, this artical analyses the similarities and differences of the “ no cessation of infringement ” rule between the fair use rule and the statutory licence rule and concludes that the legitimacy of the “no cessation of infringement” rule lies in the balance of interests in individual cases, then responds to the challenge that the application of the “ no cessation of infringement ” rule may condone more serious copyright infringement. Thirdly, this article collates a series of domestic and international practices and concludes that there are two common features: the legitimacy of the rule is based on the balance of interests; and there is a certain binding relationship between “ no cessation of infringement ” and alternative remedies. The above common features provide a direction for the rule structure to be proposed later. Finally, this article attempts to propose a rule structure for the application of the “ no cessation of infringement ” rule and puts forward the concept of “stage theory”. The stage theory advocates that the application of the “ no cessation of infringement ” rule should be divided into two stages: as the precondition for the application of the rule, the principle of interests balance is in the first stage in which the public interest should be prioritized; and the application of alternative remedies is in the second stage. Effective application of the “ no cessation of infringement ” rule will be conducive to balancing and protecting the interests of multiple parties.