轻罪立法在我国呈现积极扩张的态势导致轻罪案件数量不断攀升，轻罪治理逐渐成为我国刑事治理的主要面向。为防止数量庞大的轻罪行为人因“犯罪标签”被主流社会排斥而成为社会不稳定因素，可借鉴已建立的未成年犯罪人犯罪记录封存制度，此做法可消解在成年人犯罪领域建立彻底的前科消灭制度而产生的社会面抵触，也能降低制度成本。轻罪犯罪记录封存制度是指对被判处3年有期徒刑以下刑罚的行为人经过一定的考验期满足法定条件后封存其犯罪记录的制度，是一种通过阻断他人因知晓行为人的犯罪记录而对其进行否定性评价，最终达到帮助行为人顺利复归主流社会生活的制度。 轻罪犯罪记录封存制度的构建具有深厚的理论基础。从法学的维度审察，犯罪记录封存制度是刑事领域贯彻责任自负和罪责行相适应原则，破除“人质司法”现象，实现社会最低限度的公平正义之有效工具，也是刑事被遗忘权的题中应有之义；从社会学的维度来考量，“犯罪标签理论”和“社会排斥理论”揭示在实践中的必要性；从心理学的维度观照，轻罪犯罪记录封存制度符合社会人格可塑性原理，有利于行为人重新树立健康人格。 前科制度作为一种严厉的附随性制裁，在权利限制和资格剥夺方面轻重罪无异的做法缺乏正当化依据，也致使犯罪直接后果与间接后果“轻重倒置”；同时，前科制度所衍生出的前科株连效应，使得本就失衡的制裁措施波及近亲属，间接影响行为人自身的再社会化进程。因此，有必要在轻罪领域探索构建犯罪记录封存制度以完善人权司法保障。即使在制度构建中，面临对非规范性评价规制作用有限、与保障公众知情权存在矛盾、同现行法规体系存在抵牾、司法救济与保障措施不完善等挑战，但从我国儒家“谨罚慎刑”等传统文化思想和当代宽严相济刑事政策等多方面综合权衡，仍存在通过合理的制度设计协调各方需求的可能性。 构建适合于我国实际情况的轻罪犯罪记录封存制度是一项十分复杂的系统性工程。需要从刑事制度整体出发，着眼于犯罪记录封存制度的法条设置；封存的法定条件、启动方式；封存后的查询及解封条件；与相关社会管理制度的衔接。同时引入刑事被遗忘权制度从免除前科报告义务、删除负面信息、补充封存犯罪记录及请求司法救济四个方面体系化构建后续的司法保障与权利救济措施。

Which leads to the continuous increase of the number of misdemeanor cases, and the governance of misdemeanors has gradually become the main aspect of criminal governance in our country. In order to prevent a large number of misdemeanors from being rejected by the mainstream society due to the "criminal label" and becoming a socially unstable factor, we can learn from the established criminal record sealing system for juvenile offenders. The social conflicts caused by the elimination of the system can also reduce the cost of the system. The misdemeanor crime record sealing system refers to the system that seals up the criminal records of the perpetrators who have been sentenced to 3 years of imprisonment or less after a certain probation period and meets the statutory conditions. Negative evaluation of it will eventually achieve a system that helps the perpetrator return to mainstream social life smoothly. The construction of the misdemeanor criminal record sealing system has a profound theoretical basis. From the perspective of law, the criminal record sealing system is an effective tool to implement the principle of self-responsibility and criminal responsibility in the criminal field, to break the phenomenon of "hostage justice", and to achieve the minimum level of fairness and justice in society. It is also an effective tool for the criminal right to be forgotten. It is meaningful; considered from the dimension of sociology, "criminal label theory" and "social exclusion theory" reveal the necessity in practice; viewed from the dimension of psychology, the system of sealing up misdemeanor criminal records conforms to the principle of social personality plasticity, Help the perpetrator to re-establish a healthy personality. As a severe incidental sanction, the criminal record system lacks any justification for the practice of making no difference between minor and serious crimes in terms of rights restriction and deprivation of qualifications. The entanglement effect of previous convictions makes the already unbalanced sanctions spread to close relatives, indirectly affecting the perpetrator‘s own resocialization process. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the construction of a criminal record sealing system in the field of misdemeanors to improve the judicial protection of human rights. Even in the construction of the system, there are challenges such as limited regulation of non-normative evaluation, conflicts with the protection of the public‘s right to know, conflicts with the current legal system, and imperfect judicial relief and safeguards. " and other traditional cultural ideas and the contemporary criminal policy of combining leniency with strictness, etc., there is still the possibility of coordinating the needs of all parties through reasonable system design. It is a very complicated and systematic project to build a misdemeanor record sealing system suitable for the actual situation in our country. It is necessary to start from the criminal system as a whole and focus on the legal setting of the criminal record sealing system; the legal conditions and activation methods of sealing; the query and unsealing conditions after sealing; and the connection with relevant social management systems. At the same time, the criminal right to be forgotten system is introduced to systematically build follow-up judicial protection and rights relief measures from four aspects: exempting from the obligation to report criminal records, deleting negative information, supplementing and sealing up criminal records, and requesting judicial relief.