本文的研究内容为真实情境中的光色喜好。随着先进照明的技术发展，以LED为核心、亮度和色温可独立调节的照明系统不断完善，基于环境行为心理、同时考虑健康与喜好的真实情境照明需求愈发重要。本研究基于亮度色温可独立调节、可实现智能控制的照明技术，通过三类典型日常情境（住宅起居室照明、道路照明、城市街区照明）与多种研究方法（文献综述、实地调研、现场实测、主观评价、数据分析）的组合，完成在非实验室模拟条件下对真实情境光色喜好问题的研究。本研究通过构建不同情境下的研究方法，采用描述性统计、方差分析、非参数检验、相关分析等统计手段，分析得到三类真实情境下被试对于照明的喜好结果，并着重分析了性别、年龄、色温、照度、实验温度等影响因素对于光色喜好的交互作用。研究表明：（1）在不同行为下，不同性别和年龄的被试对于住宅照明喜好的选择不同，一般照明倾向于中低色温，阅读、手工需要的任务照明倾向于中高色温，四种行为模式下，不同年龄和性别的被试对于色温的喜好均无显著性差异；（2）被试对道路照明的光色喜好倾向于2700-2900 K的中低色温，实验温度、照度、色温之间存在交互作用；（3）被试对城市街区照明的光色喜好倾向于2300-3000 K的中低色温，色温和性别体现不同的主效应及交互作用。综合以上三个实验，形成适用于三种真实情境的光色喜好研究方法，总结与光色喜好和照明喜好较强相关的评价因素，获得被试对于真实情境下照明色温的多因素评价结果。本研究为聚焦照明喜好的研究方法和实验条件设置提供了新的可能，为基于环境、行为、心理、个体差异的精细化照明设计提供建议，也为光色评价体系的建立与照明标准的更新提供了参考。
The research in this paper is about light color preferences in real-life situations. With the development of advanced lighting technology, LED-based lighting systems with independently adjustable luminance and color temperature are being improved, and the need for real-life contextual lighting based on environmental behavior and psychology, taking into account health and preferences, is becoming increasingly important. This study is based on lighting technology with independently adjustable luminance and color temperature and intelligent control, and the study of light color preferences in real situations is completed under non-laboratory simulation conditions through a combination of three types of typical daily situations （residential lighting, road lighting, and urban neighborhood lighting） and various research methods （literature review, field research, field measurements, subjective evaluation, and data analysis）.In this study, we used descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, non-parametric tests, and correlation analysis to analyze the results of participants‘ lighting preferences in three types of real situations, and focused on the interaction effects of gender, age, color temperature, illuminance, and experimental temperature on light color preferences. The study showed that: （1） Under different behaviors, participants of different genders and ages had different preferences for residential lighting, general lighting tended to have low to medium color temperature, task lighting for reading and crafting tended to have medium to high color temperature, and there were no significant differences in color temperature preferences among participants of different ages and genders in the four behavioral modes; （2） Participans‘ color preferences for road lighting tended to be 2700 -2900 K. There was an interaction between experimental temperature, illuminance, and color temperature; （3） Participants‘ preferences for urban neighborhood lighting tended to be low to medium color temperature of 2300-3000 K. Color temperature and gender reflected different main effects and interactions. The above three experiments were combined to form light color preference research methods applicable to three real situations, to summarize the evaluation factors strongly related to light color preference and lighting preference, and to obtain the multi-factor evaluation results of color temperature in real situations. This study provides a new possibility for the research methods and experimental condition settings focusing on lighting preferences, provides suggestions for refined lighting design based on environmental, behavioral, psychological, and individual differences, and also provides a reference for the establishment of light color evaluation system and the update of lighting standards.
