积极通学行为为儿童提供了一个提升活动水平、改善身心健康以及与环境互动的机会。然而，急剧下降的趋势使其从一个交通问题演逐渐演变成为更广泛的健康与社会问题。大量研究表明，通学行为的决策与儿童及家长感知的空间环境变化相关，可能是由不同空间环境因素之间的复杂关系所决定。到目前为止，有些研究是从建成环境出发，对儿童通学方式选择决策做出解释，却很少对儿童的多重需求做出反映。还有一些研究侧重于公共空间对儿童户外活动、自由玩耍等具体需求的影响进行探讨，却很少顾及到儿童“是否出行和如何出行”（第1章）。实际上，在儿童积极通学途中，必要性的、自发性的和社会性的行为总是以一种交织融会的模式发生，需要对此加以复合理解。学校周边的住区街道空间理应从儿童通学的方式选择与需求层次两个方面予以满足（第2章）。因此，本研究以儿童通学行为调查及其心理特征分析为切入点，从围绕行人与机动交通之间关系的邻里与街道相关理论“范式转变”出发，结合环境行为学对于行为与场景的呈现，流空间理论对于流动与变化的强调，以及城市整体主义对于多样与流动的平衡，提出了耦合儿童通学行为（出行及相关行为）的住区街道（场流）二象空间模型（第3章）。该模型尝试将人们对于住区街道空间的认识和理解引入动态的社会空间，实现效率与活力的平衡、安全与趣味的统一，并以此作为影响儿童通学行为的住区街道空间评价体系构建的理论支撑。本研究经由流载体和流节点对主要建成环境类别划分的链接以及方向感和认同感对公共空间设计特征的串联，实现了住区街道流空间决策因素和场空间质量标准的有机整合以及指标体系框架的生成。结合AHP法、德尔菲法和模糊综合评价法对评价体系的指标遴选与确立、权重赋值与释义以及数据收集与分析的全程量化处理，构建出了较为完整、科学和实用的评价体系（第4、5、6章）。通过5个校区周边住区街道空间的实证研究及其评价结果的横向对比分析发现：①目标层的评价结果具有较强的分辨度；②准则层影响因素的评价结果不存在交叉，显示出与目标层明显的同步性特征；③虽然子准则层评价结果出现交叉，但主要是由于影响因素不均衡造成的，它们的波动幅度与目标层评价结果负相关（第7章）。这些发现，基本反映了评价体系在住区街道空间政策制定和规划干预等方面的价值。
Active school travel behaviour（STB）provides an opportunity to increase their activity level, improve their physical and mental health, and interact with the environment. However, the sharp downward trend makes it gradually evolve from a traffic problem into a broader health and social problem. A large number of studies have shown that the decision-making of general learning behavior is related to the spatial environment changes perceived by children and parents, which may be determined by the complex relationship between different spatial environment factors. So far, some studies are based on the built environment to explain the decision-making of school travel mode choice, but rarely reflect the multiple needs of children. There are still some studies focusing on the impact of public space on children's outdoor activities, free play and other specific needs, but rarely involving children's "whether to travel and how to travel" (Chapter 1). In fact, on the way to school, the necessary, spontaneous and social behaviors always take place in an intertwined mode. We need to have a compound understanding of children's STB. The residential street space around the campus should be satisfied from two aspects: children's school travel mode choice and the hierarchy of needs (Chapter 2).Therefore, taking children's STB survey and its psychological characteristics analysis as the breakthrough point, starting from the "paradigm shift" of neighborhood and street related theories that focuses on the relationship between pedestrian and motorized traffic, and combining with the presentation of behavior and scene by Environment-behavior Theory, the emphasis of flow and change by Flow Space Theory, and the balance of diversity and flow by Integral Urbanism, this study proposes a residential street space model coupling children's STB. It tries to introduce people's cognition and understanding of residential street space into dynamic social space, so as to realize the balance of efficiency and vitality, and the unity of safety and interest. And it can be used as the theoretical support for the construction of the evaluation system of residential street space which affects children's STB.Through the connection of flow carrier and flow node to the classification of built environment, and the connection of sense of direction and identity to the design features of public space, this study realizes the organic integration of the space of flows decision-making factors and the space of places quality criteria, and generates index system framework. Combining quantitative process of selecting and establishing the index, assigning and explaining the weight, and collection and analysis of data by AHP method, Delphi method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, this paper constructs a relatively complete, scientific and practical evaluation system (Chapter 4, 5 and 6).Through the empirical study of the street space around five campuses and the horizontal comparative analysis of the evaluation results, it is found that: ① the evaluation results of the target layer have a strong resolution; ② There is no cross between the evaluation results of the influencing factors of the criterion layer, which shows obvious synchronization characteristics between the criterion layer and the target layer; ③ Although there are some overlaps in the evaluation results of sub criteria layer, they are mainly caused by the imbalance of influencing factors, and their fluctuation amplitude is negatively correlated with the evaluation results of target layer (Chapter 7). These findings basically reflect the value of the evaluation system in street space policy-making and planning intervention.
