不断增加的城市人口、城市扩张和城市交通造成的排放是现代大都市的挑战。自2000年以来，智能城市理念一直试图为大多数城市的问题提供可持续的智能解决方案。尽管取得了进展，但个别机动车交通、拥堵或缺乏自行车道的问题仍然存在。维也纳和深圳都创建了框架战略，以促进智慧城市的进一步实施，特别是在移动领域，因为它可以产生重大影响。当考虑到智能交通管理系统、移动站和综合共享交通方案时，相关性几乎是无穷无尽的。出于这个原因，作者阐述了两个研究问题。智慧城市的理念是否改善了城市交通？智慧城市历年如何改善城市交通？在此背景下，论文将在智能交通的背景下介绍两个城市的交通现状，随后对智能交通在公共和私营领域的发展进行比较分析，并对城市发展计划中提到的努力以及框架战略给出见解。第一部分指出了研究的必要性，并通过提供基本的背景信息来确定目标。随后，文献综述通过将现有文献分为四个领域，确定了智能城市和智能交通的科学状况。智能交通的理念和指标；治理、规划和智能交通；趋势和实施；以及智能创新。这项工作是基于对其他学者工作的研究分析和自己对维也纳和深圳智能交通的评估，遵循了Orlowski和Romanowska在2019年提出的一套因素和指标。作者将其研究总结为两个可视化的对比分析表格。很明显，维也纳在参与式城市规划方法方面有其优势，并且试图从以消费者为中心的角度发展智慧城市。不同的是，深圳采用的是自上而下的规划方法，遵循了城市规划师的建议和预测，形成了一种更简洁的风格效果，展现了一种更大的对ICT创新的关注。这项工作表明，在不久的将来，现代城市交通将被智慧交通城市规划方案所主导。深圳和维也纳当下的方案的实施只是对未来城市格局的一点推测，但考虑到市政议程中对智能交通的优先考虑，新式发展的重要性不言而喻。
Increasing urban population, urban sprawl, and emissions caused by urban traffic are the challenges of modern metropolises. Since the 2000s, smart city concepts have offered sustainable, smart solutions to most cities' problems. Despite progress, issues with individual motorized traffic, congestion, or lack of bicycle roads remain. Vienna and Shenzhen both created framework strategies to promote further implementation of smart city, particularly in the mobility sector, because it can have a significant impact. The spectrum is nearly endless when thinking of smart traffic management systems, mobility stations, and combined shared-mobility options. For that reason, the author elaborates two research questions: Did smart city concepts improve urban mobility? How smart city concepts improve urban mobility?In this context, the thesis will present the current traffic situation in both cities on the background of Smart Mobility, followed by a comparative analysis on direct impact of Smart Mobility in the public and private sector, and gives insights into the efforts mentioned in urban development plans, and framework strategies. The first section identifies the research necessity and frames the objective by providing essential background information. Subsequently, the literature review identifies the scientific situation of Smart City and Smart Mobility by dividing the available literature into four fields: Concepts and Indicators of Smart Mobility; Governance, Planning and Smart Mobility; Trends and Implementation; and Smart Innovations. This work is based on research analysis of other scholars’ work and own assessment of Smart Mobility in Vienna and Shenzhen, following a set of factors and indicators suggested by Orlowski and Romanowska in 2019.The author concludes his research with a comparative analysis visualized in two tables. It became evident that Vienna has its strengths in the participatory urban planning approach and tries to include the people from a consumer-centric perspective in implementing Smart Mobility. Shenzhen focuses on a top-down approach, following the recommendations of urban planners and their predictions, leading to a more concise outcome and a more significant focus on ICT innovation.This work demonstrates that modern urban traffic will be dominated by Smart Mobility solutions in the near future. The possibilities of today already implemented in Shenzhen and Vienna are just a little grasp in a bigger picture of future cities, but bearing in mind the prioritization given to Smart Mobility in agendas of the municipal governments, highlights the urgency of new developments.
