本论文主题为基于“战略-实施-政策”多元协作规划实施策略的国际经验与北京案例研究。在精细化城市治理和市场转型背景下，政府与市场多元主体协作成为推动我国规划实施和城市治理改革的重要方向。然而，我国规划实施长期存在“编而不用”的难题，关键在于实施目标、机制与手段之间缺少关联衔接的制度设计。上世纪七十年代以来，英国、美国、日本、新加坡等西方经济体为适应市场转型挑战，构建了多元协作的规划实施策略，以应对规划干预与市场竞争间不相协调的困境，推动规划战略目标的落实。论文探索通过政府规划、市场间的协作关系推动战略目标落实，针对北京规划实施难题寻找一种路径与方法。 论文探索构建了“战略-实施-政策”多元协作规划实施策略，并基于这一框架研究了伦敦规划及实施计划、纽约 2050战略规划及行动计划、东京2020实施计划等全球城市案例，深入剖析了伦敦横贯铁路、轨道交通北线延长段、纽约哈得森庭园三个大型项目及伦敦、纽约可支付住房目标两个社会设施案例。国际经验表明，近年来在城市治理中，政府、市场合作得到广泛认同，为推动政府、市场主体间的协作，西方国家在规划实施中采取了“战略-实施-政策”策略，将近期战略目标分解与实施进程关联，融入各级各类政府职能机构、市场开发主体、金融主体、居民及社区力量等实施主体广泛参与的机制之中，运用管控型、激励引导型、财税杠杆型、特殊融资手段等政策干预工具，催化战略目标实施。 结合国际经验研究，论文进一步开展了“战略-实施-政策”框架下的北京规划实施策略研究。近年来北京市将“街区控规+综合实施方案”作为规划实施改革的重点领域，有效推动规划整合、明确实施路径及项目资金平衡。论文认为综合实施方案创新将引领我国规划实施逻辑的转型，“战略-实施-政策”多元协作规划实施策略的完善有助于深化综合实施方案的具体内涵，推动综合实施方案深化改革，使其成为解决规划实施难题的具体平台。据此，论文以北京市某社会设施项目及某新城核心区大型项目为例，对“战略-实施-政策”多元协作实施策略展开研究，从战略目标分解、多元主体协作实施机制构建、政策工具干预应用等方面提供策略展望。论文建议，北京市应当探索构建“战略-实施-政策”多元协作规划实施策略，改变依靠各级各类规划指标、分层落实的传统实施逻辑，围绕规划战略目标创新发展近期战略目标分解、实施主体广泛参与、政策干预工具设计的实施机制。

This research focuses on the overseas experiences and Beijing case study on the "strategy-implementation-policy" planning implementation strategy of multi-stakeholder collaboration. The urban governance at the finer level and the transformation towards an advanced market economy, with more diversified stakeholders involved, have become momentous tendencies for spatial planning implementation and urban governance in China. However, Chinese cities have witnessed long-lasting difficulties in planning implementation practices. Their crucial problems lie in the lack of institutional linkages between planning objectives, the implementation mechanism and the policy instruments. Since the 1970s, confronted with challenges brought by market-oriented transformation, advanced western economies such as the UK, the US, Japan and Singapore have built the planning implementation strategy of multi-stakeholder collaboration. This planning implementation strategy aims to solve the uncoordinated dilemma between planning intervention and market competition, as well as promote the implementation of strategic planning objectives. This dissertation explores the cooperative relationship between government-led planning and the market to promote the implementation of strategic objectives, and seeks an approach and method to solve the difficulties of planning implementation in Beijing.This dissertation establishes the "strategy-implementation-policy" planning implementation strategy of multi-stakeholder collaboration. Based on this framework, this research investigates the London Plan Implementation Plan, the OneNYC 2050 Action Plan for New York City, the First Tokyo 2020 Implementation Plan, three strategic plans of the global cities London, New York and Tokyo. In particular, this dissertation studies three representative mega-developments in detail, including the London Crossrail, the London Northern Line Extension and the New York Hudson Yards, as well as two projects of social/civic facility provisions including the London affordable housing strategies and the New York affordable housing targets. Overseas experiences exhibit that, in recent years, the cooperation between the government and the market in urban governance has been widely recognized. In order to promote the collaboration between the government and the market forces, the western countries have adopted a similar "strategy-implementation-policy" planning implementation strategy of multi-stakeholder collaboration. The strategy connects the decomposition of recent strategic objectives and the local implementation process, and reconciles the multi-stakeholder collaboration mechanism involving the governmental institutions, the market developers, the financial body, residents and community forces. The "strategy-implementation-policy" planning implementation strategy also includes the policy intervention using public-policy instruments such as the regulatory control vehicles, the incentive and guidance vehicles, the fiscal and tax leverage vehicles, and the special financing instruments. These three components of the "strategy-implementation-policy" planning implementation strategy for multi-stakeholder collaborations catalyze the implementation of strategic planning objectives.Drawing experiences from the overseas case studies, this dissertation further investigates the planning implementation strategy of Beijing based on our "strategy-implementation-policy" planning implementation framework of multi-stakeholder collaboration. In recent years, Beijing has comprehensively adopted and combined the block-level regulatory plan (jiequ kongzhixing xiangxi guihua) and the comprehensive planning implementation scheme (CPIS, Guihua zonghe shishi fangan) during the municipal reform of planning implementation. The innovative CPIS instrument is beneficial for coordinating multiple planning schemes into one coordinated planning scheme, adopting appropriate directions for implementation, and achieving balanced budget plans. This dissertation reckons that the innovative CPIS instrument is estimated to lead to a transformation in the planning implementation mechanism of Chinese cities. The establishment and improvement of the "strategy-implementation-policy" planning implementation strategy assist in deepening the innovative utilization of the CPIS vehicle, promoting the reform of the CPIS vehicle, and making it a practical platform for solving difficulties in planning implementation. In this case, this dissertation takes a social facility project and an urban mega project in a new city in Beijing as examples. Through case studies, the research investigates the "strategy-implementation-policy" planning implementation strategy of multi-stakeholder collaboration, and provides policy advocacies focusing on the decomposition of strategic objectives, the establishment of multi-stakeholder collaboration mechanism, and the design and application of policy instruments. This dissertation suggests that Beijing should make efforts on establishing the "strategy-implementation-policy" planning implementation framework for multi-stakeholder collaboration. The traditional planning implementation pattern which relies on the government-led urban planning system is supposed to be reformed. This planning implementation mechanism should also involve the decomposition of recent strategic objectives, the mobilization of multi-stakeholders, and the design and application of innovative policy instruments.