恐怖主义犯罪威胁国家安全，破坏社会秩序，危害民众生命财产安全，是破坏性最严重的犯罪类型，雄踞于犯罪金字塔的顶端。如果说恐怖主义犯罪是恐怖主义的末梢神经的话，那么法律反恐则是打击恐怖主义犯罪的首选项，也是反恐体系中最具痛感的地方。需要注意的是，在依法严厉打击恐怖主义犯罪的同时，充分尊重和保障诉讼参与人及其他民众的基本人权也是最重要且最需关注的价值目标。而刑事诉讼程序法的重要功能就是惩罚犯罪、保障人权、规制公权。反恐诉讼实践中产生的诸多滥权、侵权问题，亟需刑事诉讼程序理论层面予以适当回应，给予必要理论支撑和立法支持。然而，我国现有反恐刑事诉讼程序立法存在理念保守、系统性不强、可操作性不够、人权保障不足、专门规则指引不到位等问题。结合当前恐怖主义犯罪特点和发展态势以及我国关于恐怖主义犯罪的刑事诉讼立法现状，仅仅在普通诉讼程序基础之上进行零星局部的特殊规定远远无法满足司法实践对反恐刑事诉讼程序立法的需求。解决的根本出路在于，在反恐背景下进行刑事诉讼程序研究和改革，以国际刑事司法基本人权标准为底限，对恐怖主义犯罪刑事诉讼程序进行专门规定，建立系统化反恐刑事诉讼特别程序。为此，本文主要从以下方面进行理论论证和程序建构：首先理清和回答反恐刑事诉讼特别程序研究的立基点、反恐刑事政策的影响以及面临的基本问题、反恐刑事诉讼特别程序的正当性考察和基本原则等。在此基础上，按照反恐刑事诉讼进程的先后顺序分别对反恐人身羁押制度、反恐侦查权法治化、反恐庭审中的控辩关系、反恐刑事诉讼证据规则等重要内容分别选取一个切入点进行系统分析和重点论述。在具体章节阐述说明中，一般按照理论机理、域外借鉴、司法案例、本土建构的基本思路来进行分析和论证，在突出各部分理论深度的同时，注重程序立法和司法实践的有机结合，注重国内和国外的相互借鉴。
The crime of terrorism threat to national security, destroy of the social order, endanger people's lives and property safety, is the most damaging type of crime, the crime of the top ranked in Pyramid. If terrorist crime is the peripheral nerve of terrorism, then the legal counter-terrorism is the first choice for combating terrorism crime, and it is also the most painful place in the anti-terrorism system. We should pay attention to that, when we fight against terrorism in accordance with the law, we must fully respect and protect the basic human rights of the participants and other people. The important function of the criminal procedure law is to punish the crime, protect the human rights and regulate the public power. Many problems of abuse of rights and tort arising from the practice of anti-terrorism need urgent response from the theoretical level of criminal procedure, giving necessary theoretical support and legislative support.However, China's existing anti-terrorism criminal procedure legislation has such problems as conservative concept, imperfect system, insufficient operation, inadequate human rights protection and incomplete special rules guidance. According to the characteristics of the crime of terrorism and the development situation of our country and on the terrorism crime criminal legislation, special provisions were only sporadic local on the basis of the ordinary procedure is far unable to meet the needs of the judicial practice of criminal procedure legislation against terrorism. The fundamental solution is to carry out the research and reform of criminal procedure under the background of anti-terrorism, take the basic human rights standard of international criminal justice as the bottom limit, make special provisions on the criminal procedure of terrorism crime, and establish the special procedure of systematic criminal proceedings of anti-terrorism. For that reason, the article mainly expounds the theories and argumentation from the following aspects: first, to clarify and answer the basis points of the special procedure of anti-terrorism criminal proceedings, the impact of anti-terrorism criminal policy and the basic problems, the legitimacy study of the special procedure of anti-terrorism criminal proceedingsang and the basic priciples and so on. On this basis, according to the sequence of the process of anti-terrorism criminal procedure, the anti-terrorism system of personal detention, the rule of law of anti-terrorism investigation, the relation of the accusation and defense in the anti-terrorism court trial, the evidence rules of anti-terrorism criminal procedure are respectively systematic stated and mainly discussed from a breakthrough point. In the explanation of specific chapters, it is generally analyzed and demonstrated in accordance with the basic ideas of theoretical mechanism, foreign reference, judicial cases and local system, emphasizing the theoretical depth of each part, paying attention to the organic combination of procedural legislation and judicial practice, and attaching importance to the mutual reference between domestic and foreign countries.
