人和动物关系是人和自然关系的重要部分。自彼得·辛格的《动物解放》1975出版以来，西方学界关于动物伦理议题的讨论不断丰富和深化，相关理论可以说已经进入第二波或第三波。有关动物的道德地位、法律地位的讨论在过去半个世纪中已经积累了大量的文本，但谈论动物政治地位的著作仍然少见。金里卡与唐纳森共同建构的“动物政治学”是其中最重要贡献之一。该理论系统地讨论了动物的政治身份，并且具有鲜明的特色，是一种关系性的、群体差异化的动物伦理理论。本研究选取其中涉及驯养动物的部分作为主要讨论对象，在梳理 “公民身份”于政治理论中含义的同时将其与经典动物权利理论的废除主义立场进行对话，以回答驯养动物的公民身份何以可能、何以必要。本文认为，“动物政治”的理论构建不仅仅大大拓展了动物伦理学的视野，也会促使我们对公民身份、能动性等范畴本身做出新的理解。其从残疾人权利、儿童权利理论吸收理论资源会同时促进这几项运动的交叉和互相促进。它也会启发更多将政治理论的核心范畴和动物议题关联起来的工作。

Human-animal relationship is an important part of human-nature relationship. Since Peter Singer's publication of Animal Libration in 1975,the discussion of animal ethics in Western academic circles has been enriched and deepened,.animal ethics can be said to have entered the second or third wave. Discussions about the moral status and legal status of animals have accumulated a large amount of literature in the past half century, but work on the political status of animals are still rare.“Zoopolis” co-constructed by Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka is one of the most important contributions. This theory systematically discusses the political status of animals and has distinctive characteristics:it is a relational and group-differentiated animal ethics theory.This study selects the part that involves domesticated animals as the main discussion object. While combing the meaning of “citizenship” in political theory, it also dialogues with the abolitionist position of classical animal rights theory to answer the question of how the citizenship of domesticated animals is possible and why it is necessary。This paper argues that the theoretical construction of "animal politics" not only greatly expands the horizon of animal ethics, but also prompts us to have a new understandings of citizenship, agency. The absorption of theoretical resources from disabilitiy rights theory and the children's rights theory will also promote the intersection of the three movements. It will also inspire more work that relate animal issues with the core concepts of political theory.