抵制萨德、抵制韩国的热浪从2017年初一直拍打至今，形成一次新的网络集体行动。本文以此为契机，将研究重点放在大学生群体的参与行动上，目的在于从微观层面探究个体参与网络集体行动的动力机制，为把握我国大学生群体心理和网络集体行动内在逻辑提供新的思路。 前两章分别为“引言”和“文献综述及研究问题”。笔者首先从现实和理论两方面说明了研究的意义和必要性。并沿着理性选择、社会认同、相对剥夺感、群际情绪和社会网络五条路径，分析了国内外学者对集体行动参与动机的研究著述，梳理出八种具体要素。同时，借鉴网络政治参与和国内网络民族主义研究成果，补充了迷群、官方态度和参与行为的显性隐性区分。第二章最后提出了十二个研究假设，分别验证以上各要素对参与行为的影响。 在第三章“研究设计”中，笔者详细介绍了抽样方法、问卷量表设计及检验和深度访谈人员信息。量表严格对应第二章提出的不同要素设计。 第四章为“研究结果”。对437个大学生进行问卷调查后发现，价值判断、自我效能、集体效能、官方态度感知、国家认同、反韩饭认同、相对剥夺感、群际情绪、社会网络嵌入程度，均与参与程度有显著正相关，风险代价判断与之有显著负相关。十个研究假设得到了证明。与研究假设不同的是，主观规范与参与程度无显著相关，韩饭群体认同则与参与程度成显著正相关。 针对第四章发现的新现象，第五章进行了详细探讨。研究认为，此次事件中的韩饭群体认同为二级认同，在与一级群体认同发生冲突时，使迷群感到悲情，促使其采取反向、沉默和反击三种行为，体现出情感政治的特征。无论是哪一种方式，均是认同冲突下，粉丝个体调节悲情的努力。重要他人在弱连接盛行的网络世界，无法提供更具异质性的信息，对大学生的影响减弱。与之相对，官方态度在强调国家认同的网络事件中，表现出强大的价值引领能力。参与者会主动感知国家意志，以此判断行动的性质，当发现抵制行动与国家意志相符合，行动就有了“爱国”的性质，参与行动就有了“表达爱国”的意义，甚至在一定程度上弥补对行动实际效果的不信任。 综合全文，本研究认为在萨德事件中，我国大学生参与网络集体行动的心理动机，呈现出“理性与感性并存，情绪饱满但克制”的特点。
The boycotts of THAAD and South Korea have been urged since the beginning of 2017, forming a new wave of online collective action. Focused on the college students, this article takes the opportunity to explore the dynamic mechanism of individual participation in online collective action from the micro level, so as to provide new ideas for popular mind of university students and the internal logic of collective actions.The first two chapters are "Introduction" and "Literature review and research issues." The background is explained from two aspects of reality and theory. Based on five paths including rational choice, social identity, relative deprivation, inter-group sentiment, and social network, the author analyzes domestic and foreign scholars' researches on the collective action participation motivation, combing out eight specific elements. Also learning from researches on online political participation and domestic online nationalism, the study takes fandom, official attitudes, and explicit participation behavior into consideration. At the end of the second chapter, twelve research hypotheses are proposed to explore the influence of each element from above on the participation behavior.In the third chapter "Research design", the author introduced the sampling method, questionnaire scale design and inspection and in-depth interviewer information in detail. The design of scales strictly corresponds to the elements proposed in Chapter 2.The fourth chapter is "Research results." After analyzing the questionnaires of 437 college students, we found that the value judgment, self-efficacy, collective efficacy, official attitude, national identification, degree of ANTI Korean fans group identification, relative deprivation, inter-group sentiment, and the degree of social network embedding are significant positively related to the degree of participation, and the risk-cost judgment of the participating activities has a significant negative correlation. While different from the research hypothesis, there is no significant correlation between the subjective norms that reflect the perception of important people’s attitude and the degree of participation, at the same time the recognition of the Korean fans group is significantly positively correlated with the degree of participation.Chapter 5 discusses the new issues found in Chapter 4 in detail. The study believes that Korean fans group identification, as a secondary group of the internal group in THAAD incident, collides with the primary group identification. That make the fans feel sad and shows the characteristics of emotional politics. As a consequence they tend to adopt three kinds of behaviors: reverse, silence, and counterattack, each of which is an endeavor to deal with the sad feeling. Important others do not provide more heterogeneous information and their impact on college students diminishes. In contrast, official attitudes have demonstrated a strong value leadership capability in the cyber event that emphasizes national identity. Participants will actively perceive the will of the state to determine the nature of action. When they find that the boycott is consistent with the will of the state, they will perceive the action as “patriotic”, and participation in action will have the meaning of “expression of patriotism”. To a degree, it even compensates for the distrust of the actual effect of the action.In a word, in this THAAD case, the psychological motivation of Chinese college students to participate in online collective action, shows characteristics of "rationality and sensibility coexist, full of emotion but restrained".
