少墙框架结构能解决纯框架结构冗余度低、最大弹性层间位移角超限等问题，此方法在既有结构中已经有一定的应用。为了进一步的了解少墙框架结构与纯框架结构在新建多层建筑中抗震性能的差异，本文主要做了以下工作：以一栋中学教学楼为算例，场地类别选取为Ⅲ类，建筑层数选取二至五层，从抗震设防烈度、地震分组、建筑层数等多个设计参数出发，对10个纯框架结构模型进行小震弹性分析，找出弹性层间位移角不满足规范限值的4个参数工况，即：设防烈度为7度（0.1g）、地震分组为三组、建筑层数为四层、五层；设防烈度为7度（0.15g）、地震分组为一组、建筑层数为四层、三层。从上述范围中选取一个具有代表性的纯框架结构模型—7度（0.1g）、三组、Ⅲ类、五层，通过增设少量剪力墙形成少墙框架结构，采用小震下弹性分析及大震下静力弹塑性分析，评价四个少墙框架结构设计方案的优劣性，并验证得出：本算例的四个少墙框架结构设计方案侧向变形形态与纯框架结构相一致，为剪切型。四个方案中较为合理的设计方案如下：宜在第二跨的框架柱上增设“T”形翼缘墙形成少墙框架结构，优先选择在该模型楼梯间柱子上布置。剪力墙墙厚以满足墙体稳定为前提尽量选择薄。墙肢长度以避免出现异形柱、满足周期比为前提，尽量选短。上述纯框架结构与少墙框架结构在罕遇地震及超罕遇地震（比罕遇地震高1度，加速度时程的最大值为400cm/s2）作用下的动力弹塑性对比分析得出：在罕遇地震作用下，结构主受力方向上少墙框架结构最大层间位移角小于纯框架结构；少墙框架结构的能量图更饱满，耗能更强，与纯框架结构相比结构弹塑性等效阻尼比的增幅为33.3%~166.7%；少墙框架结构塑性铰达到IO（立即入住）水准的数量更多；少墙框架结构中关键构件（框架柱）中度损坏的数量比纯框架结构少。在超罕遇地震作用下纯框架结构最大层间位移角不能满足弹塑性变形的要求，而少墙框架结构能够满足弹塑性变形要求，构件损伤方面少墙框架结构明显优于纯框架结构，塑性铰CP（防止倒塌）性能水平的数量少于纯框架结构。

The frame structure with few shear walls can solve the problem of lack of sufficient redundancy and allowable inter-story drift index and so on which frame structure contains; It is applied in the existing structure. In order to learn more about the difference between the frame structure with few shear walls and the frame structure in the new built precautionary building, The article has mainly indicate the following work: Take a school building as a calculate example, select the site of classificatory III, the building layer of two to five. Based on the design parameters as seismic precautionary intensity，seismic grouping，building layer to elasticity analysis under the frequent seismic action through ten of frame structure models, to find out four dissatisfied specification limits parameter models allowable inter-story drift index, such as with the seismic precautionary intensity of 7(0.1g), seismic grouping of three, building layer of 4th or 5th; and with the seismic precautionary intensity of 7(0.15g), seismic grouping of one, building layer of 4th or 3rd.Select representative frame structure model —7(0.1g) , grouping of three, site of classificatory III, layer of five from the above range, to form the frame structure with few shear walls model through added few shear walls, to choose elasticity analysis under the frequent seismic action and static analysis (pushover) under rare seismic action to assess the four frame structure with few shear walls designs. The conclusion is as follows: The shape of the four frame structure with few shear walls designs is the same as the frame structure, Shear form. The reasonable design is as follow: It is advisable to add a "T"-shaped flange wall on the second span to form a wall-less frame structure, preferably on the staircase column. Try to choose thin and short wall which avoid special-shaped columns and require the provision as far as possible. Comparative elastic-plastic dynamic analysis under frequent seismic action and super rare seismic action(higher than the are seismic action，the maximum acceleration time is 400cm/s2) of frame structure and frame structure with few shear walls yields that: In the direction of the main force, the maximum allowable inter-story drift index of frame structure with few shear walls is smaller than that of the frame structure under the action of rare seismic; The frame structure with few shear walls seems more fully in the energy chart, energy consumption stronger, which the equivalent structural damping ratio of is 33.3%~166.7% higher than frame structure; The performance of the plastic hinge of frame structure with few shear walls has even more reached the level of IO (immediate occupancy); The number of moderate damage to the key components (frame columns) in the frame structure with few shear walls is less than that of the frame structure. The maximum allowable inter-story drift index of frame structure cannot meet the requirements of elastic-plastic deformation under super rare seismic action but frame structure with few shear walls can. On the one hand, the frame structure with few shear walls performs much better than the frame structure in damage member, on the other hand, the number of plastic hinge performance level of the frame structure with few shear walls less than frame structure.