本文的原始出发点是将建筑策划抽象为一个完整的决策过程，以决策科学的行动准则分析建筑策划中的建筑学问题。建筑策划具备建筑学固有特征，是包含了自然科学的逻辑严谨与人文科学的艺术创新的复杂系统。传统决策理论聚焦于解决确定性问题、精确性问题和可以简单化的决策问题。随着整个科学体系的发展，决策理论也逐渐向不确定性问题、随机性问题、模糊性问题和复杂性问题深入探索。为了解决建筑策划决策过程中涉及的决策要素带有模糊性的问题，尝试引入模糊决策方法。从认识论和方法论的层面，阐述了模糊数学与传统集合论的区别：否定排中律、建立隶属函数和隶属度对模糊对象进行描述和度量的理论基础。明确了建筑学问题中“亦此亦彼”现象和模糊性判断语言在建筑策划决策中的操作方法，解决了模糊性决策要素在建筑策划决策中没有决策标准的问题。广义的建筑策划，并非单指建筑设计项目的建筑策划，涉及城市空间区域开发和整体统筹的具有相同工作内容的活动均属建筑策划范畴。从建设项目属性和目标要求方面可以分为政府主导投资建设项目的建筑策划和房地产开发建设项目的建筑策划两大类。本文选取政府主导投资建设项目的建筑策划作为研究对象，充分分析了政府主导投资建设项目具有的限价设计特点和社会公共产品属性，以此为基础探讨政府主导投资建设项目的建筑策划是复杂决策体统，从方法论和技术层面进行复杂决策的系统综合分析，定义建筑策划复杂决策系统中“准则”、“属性”和“目标”三个核心概念。依据政府主导投资建设项目的建筑策划决策特点，构建“公共决策”、“管理决策”与“技术决策”共同协作发挥作用的决策系统。本文采用跨学科的研究方法——模糊决策理论作为新型工具融入建筑策划决策体系。尝试利用模糊决策方法优势解决建筑策划决策的传统难题，将文化因子、社会因子、美学因子、行为与空间感知等常用模糊性语言描述和难以找到衡量标准的决策要素正式纳入建筑策划决策范围，并避免了运用精确性方法解决模糊性问题的弊端。选取模糊多准则群决策作为对应方法和工具，指出操作中的三个核心环节分别是决策群体模糊偏好测量、模糊多属性群决策和模糊多目标群决策等，并分别提供应用案例。另外，特别针对模糊综合评判（属模糊多目标范畴）给出了案例，为后期方案评选等决策环节提供可参考的操作样本。
The original starting point of this dissertation is an abstract architectural programming as a complete decision-making process. Analyze the architectural problems in architectural programming by Action-criteria of decision making scientifically. Architectural programming is a complex system with inherent characteristics of Architecture, including rigorous logic of natural science and artistic innovation of humanities. Traditional decision theory focus on solving certainty problems, accuracy problems and problems can be simplified. With the development of the entire science system, decision theory gradually explore to uncertainty problems, randomness problems, fuzzy problems and complex problems. In order to solve the problem with the fuzziness of the decision-making elements of architectural programming decision-making process involved in the Fuzzy Decision Making. From the epistemology and methodology, explain the difference between the traditional set theory and fuzzy mathematics: negative law of excluded middle, establish the membership functions theoretical basis to describe and measure fuzzy objects. Clear architectural issues operation method of the “both front and back” phenomenon and fuzzy judgment language and in architectural programming decision. Solve the problem of no decision standards of the fuzzy decision-making element in architectural programming decisions.Generalized architectural programming, does not only refer to the building architectural programming, but also including the same work content of regional development in urban space. From the project attributes and target requirements, architectural programming can be divided into the government-led investment projects architectural programming and the real estate projects architectural programming. This dissertation selects the government-led investment projects architectural programming for the study object, analyze the government-led investment projects have “investment restrictions” design features and public goods properties. Based on these features discuss the architectural programming of the government-led investment projects is a complex decision system. By methodology and technology, carry out a comprehensive analysis of the system of complex decision-making, define three core concepts, Decision Criteria, Decision Attributes and Decision Objective. Make the "public decision-making", "management decision" and "technical decision" to work together to play a role in the decision-making system.In this dissertation, adopt interdisciplinary research methods of decision-making system into the architectural programming. Attempt to exploit the advantages of fuzzy decision making to solve the traditional problem of architectural programming. The elements of the decision, such as cultural factors, social factors, aesthetic factor, behavior and spatial perception which describe by fuzzy language and difficult to find measure criterion, formally include in the scope of architectural programming decisions. Avoid the drawbacks of accurate methods to solve the fuzzy problems. Fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making selected as a corresponding method and tools. Point out that the three core of the operation are fuzzy preference measurement of decision-making groups, fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making and fuzzy multiple objective group decision making, and applications respectively in cases. In addition, especially for fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (of the fuzzy multi-objective category) given case, provide a reference sample for the design program selection.
