我国在宋辽金时期呈现了南北分裂的政治局面，但富庶的江南地区在提高经济发展的同时，建筑也呈现欣欣向荣的态势，北部地区也通过吸收南方汉族地区先进的文化和技术，紧跟步伐。开放的街坊制城市格局、多样的建筑类型、不断发展的建筑技术和地域性的建筑风貌使宋代城市与建筑成为古代建筑史上重要的一个转折点。各朝各代的大型楼阁式建筑成为文人墨客颂扬与描绘的主要对象。然而，现存的著名楼阁为后人仿建或者依照其他朝代的形制，与原建筑大为不同。　　在我国建筑历史研究领域内，关于宋代木楼阁式建筑的整体脉络和相关联的尺寸逻辑、用材用尺等的研究尚没有形成一个完整的清晰的系统，往往是将其与明清楼阁建筑进行纵向比较，而将宋代木楼阁建筑作为一个单独的建筑门类进行横向比较，探寻其内在的逻辑与联系的研究是缺乏的。笔者将宋代木楼阁建筑作为研究对象，以实例调研、文献研究、资料整理与归纳分析等方式，研究木构楼阁建筑的构造做法，尤其是以大木作为主要研究对象，探究其内在的逻辑与联系，以此作为笔者山东齐河中华奇观园宋式楼阁建筑复原设计的基础。　　虽然我国现存的宋辽金三代木楼阁式建筑实例少，但由于我国建筑历史研究领域与本课题类似方向的研究十分丰富，为本研究奠定了深厚的文献基础。笔者将基于对宋《营造法式》大木作制度的研究，拓展实例调研对象的年限，分析天津蓟县独乐寺观音阁、河北正定县隆兴寺转轮藏殿和慈氏阁等木楼阁式建筑，查阅宋代建筑的营造法式、描绘宋式木楼阁建筑的画作、宋辽金建筑营造和地域文化与环境对建筑影响的相关文献资料，以前人的研究成果为先导，通过对比、归纳和梳理的方式探究宋代木楼阁式建筑在用尺和用材方面可能存在的内在逻辑，归纳宋时匠人遵循的营造规律。同时，笔者以理论研究为基础，借鉴前人复原仿古的设计经验，遵循宋式木楼阁建筑营造的模数制度和用尺用材方式，进行山东齐河中华奇观园宋式楼阁建筑的复原设计，加深对我国瑰丽独特的传统木构建筑与源远流长的建筑文化认知与感悟。

　　In the Song Dynasty, the Liao Dynasty and the Jin Dynasty, the territory at that time was divided into two parts politically, the north and the south. However, rich south regions enhanced economy development, and meanwhile the architecture development was also prosperous. North regions, by absorbing the advanced culture and technologies from the south regions inhabited by Han people, was also following the pace. The open neighborhood-styled urban layout, the diversified architecture types, the constantly developing architecture technologies and regional architecture features made cities and architectures in the Song Dynasty be an important turning point in the ancient history of architectures. The large-pavilion-and-building architectures in all dynasties were major targets of odes and descriptions by poets and writers. However, the existing famous buildings and pavilions were mainly built by imitating or consulting architectures in other dynasties. It means that they are different from the original ones. 　　In the study domain of architecture history in China, there is yet to be a complete and clear-cut system of studies about the overall veining of wood pavilions and buildings in Song Dynasty as well as the related size logic, materials, measurement, etc. Instead, they are often compared with pavilion & building architectures in Ming and Qing Dynasties in longitudinal direction, and the wooden pavilion & building architectures are taken as a separate architecture category to be compared in transverse direction. As a result, there are few studies that pursue the internal logics and interrelations. The author deems the wood pavilions and buildings in Song Dynasty as the research object, adopts such approaches as case study, literature study, document sum-up as well as induction and analysis, etc., and studies the structure and construction of wood pavilions and buildings, particularly large wood structure as the major research object, trying to explore the internal logics and interrelations, and taking that as the basis of designing and rebuilding the Song pavilions and buildings in Garden of Chinese Wonders in Qihe of Shandong Province. 　　Though China now only has a few wood pavilion and building examples left over from Song Dynasty, Liao Dynasty and Jin Dynasty, because there are many study domains of architecture history in China and studies of similar orientation with this topic, laying solid literature foundation for this study. Based on research about large wood structure system as described in Building Methods (Ying-tsao Fah-shih), the author has expanded the age limit of case study objects while analyzing the wood pavilions and buildings such as Mercy Goddess Pavilion in Dule Temple in Ji County of Tianjin, the Zhuanlun-zang Hall and Cishi Pavilion in Longxing Temple of Zhengding County in Hebei Province, etc. By consulting relative literatures and documents about the building methods of Song Dynasty, the paintings describing wood pavilions and buildings in Song Dynasty, building methods in Song Dynasty, Liao Dynasty and Jin Dynasty, and influences of regional cultures and environments on architectures, the author takes the previous research results as the leading points and adopts such methods as comparison, induction and sorting-out to explore the possible internal logic in measurement and materials for wood pavilions and buildings in Song Dynasty and conclude the building laws followed by Song architects and technicians. At the same time, the author also uses the theoretical study as the basis, bears upon the ancestors’ experience in restored and archaized architectures, and uses the modular regime, and measurement and materials ways in building wood pavilions and structures in Song Dynasty to design and re-build Song pavilions and buildings in the Garden of Chinese Wonders in Qihe of Shandong Province so as to deepen the conception and understanding of the most attractive and distinctive traditional wood structures and lasting architecture culture in China.