现行执行参与分配法律规范供应不足和内容紊乱，是我国参与分配制度与实践脱节的制度原因。为健全法律，执行参与分配司法解释酝酿十余年，迟迟不能出台，成为最高法院司法解释历史上一道奇特的风景。基于对“从理论论证理论”型研究模式不能解决问题的认识，本文以多年调研尤其是2011年全国专门调研所得数据为素材，按照归纳法，运用统计学原理进行数理分析，对我国参与分配实践进行系统总结，探索和论证完善方案。调研结果显示，参与分配案件本身比例不高，但牵涉案件数量大，解决了大量社会问题，对目前执行参与分配实践应予积极评价。参与分配表现出一般按照平等原则分配、“参与分配取代破产”、“七成以上符合条件的案件没有参与分配”等特点，经分析认为反映了参与分配 “入口”和“出口”均不畅的问题。我国执行参与分配制度，在性质和基本功能等方面与国外有重大差异。应借鉴国外规定精神，结合实践对我国参与分配制度进行改造。认为对自然人、法人的参与分配现状应予维持。对于企业法人参与分配，应通过采用优先分配原则、建立分配期日和对适格债务人的通知制度、明确界定参与分配债权人主体资格等途径，打通“入口”，疏通“出口”，提高分配效率。对于参与分配完毕的案件，可不经过查找财产等“规定动作”，经理念改造后的终结执行程序彻底退出。以增强分配程序刚性和效率为原则，对参与分配流程进行了具体设计。

AbstractThe current legal norm on the participation in distribution of the civil enforcement procedure is insufficient and its content is in a mess， which leads to the divorce between the regulation and the practice of participation in distribution in China fundamentally. The preparation for the judicial interpretation on participation in distribution for the sake of improving our legal system has been carried out for more than one decade but is still unveiled， becoming the peculiar case in the history of judicial interpretation in the Supreme People’s Court. After realizing the research mode of “theory to argument to theory” can not solve the issue， the author conducts mathematical analysis on the data collected through his many years’ investigation， especially， the national specialized investigation in 2011， with a method of induction according to the principle of statistics. In addition， he also summarizes the practice of participation in distribution in China systematically， explores and demonstrates the schedule on improving the system as well. The result of investigation indicates that the proportion of the participation in distribution case is relatively low， a large quantity of case is involved， and lots of social problems have been resolved. Therefore， the current practice on participation in distribution is worth affirmation. However， the participation in distribution is equipped with the following characteristics， namely， conforming to the principle of equality， participation in distribution replacing going bankrupt， over 70 percent of eligible cases not participating in distribution， which reflects the problem both in the entrance and exit of participation in distribution. The nature and basic function of system of participation in distribution in China is significantly different from that of foreign countries. It is necessary to refer the spirit of stipulation of foreign countries and transform the system in China according to the reality. The author holds that the current natural person and unincorporated association’s participation in distribution system should be maintained. As for corporation， it should set the specific date and the notification system for the qualified debtor， define the subject qualification of the creditor participated in distribution by adopting the principle of dispatching priority to get through the entrance and exit and enhance the efficiency of distribution. For the case completing the participation in distribution， the compulsory procedure， for example， seeking for the property， is no longer needed and the executive routine for finalization will be removed completely. It conducts a specific design for the process of participation in distribution based on the principle of enhancing the rigidity and efficiency of distribution procedure. Key words: civil enforcement; participate in distribution; bankruptcy; principle of allocation; perfection of legislation