本篇论文选择清代离宫御苑朝寝空间作为研究对象，在大量原始资料考证的基础上，结合现代的视角和空间分析手法，从“宫殿”职能的角度对这些离宫的朝寝建筑及其空间图式展开研究，以求揭示其作为紫禁城之外帝后主要的政治活动与日常生活场所的特殊性质及其产生的政治、历史、社会、文化根源。论文第一章引言部分主要对文中的关键词、选题意义、国内外研究现状和论文工作框架分别作出解释和说明。第二章对清代从后金初期直至晚清各时期宫苑系统发展的历程及其历史背景作出概述，特别强调了离宫在其中的特殊地位以及清帝长期园居理政的原因所在。第三章分别对清代四座离宫畅春园、避暑山庄、圆明园、颐和园的朝寝空间及其使用功能作了详细的辨析和考证，总结不同历史时期帝王以及其他皇室成员在离宫驻跸的具体时日和活动规律，以及每座离宫朝寝空间的特点所在。第四章从院落式和毡帐式两种类别以及组群、院落、单体建筑三个层次对离宫朝寝空间的主要类型进行综合分析，探讨其具体的形制特征。第五章将离宫中最重要的仪典、理政、生活起居三类空间的属性与帝王人格属性相联系，以求进一步探析离宫朝寝空间所具有的场所特性。第六章从礼制秩序与自然情结、壮丽重威与茅茨土阶、汉族文化与游牧遗风三个方面讨论离宫朝寝空间的文化内涵。第七章以圆明园和凡尔赛宫为例，对中国清代与法国波旁王朝时期的离宫朝寝空间进行比较研究，以求从历史和世界的坐标中进一步探寻中国清代离宫御苑朝寝空间的形态特质。
Basing on collecting and analyzing numerous firsthand material and documentations, the author presents the studies on architectural characteristics and spatial patterns of Chaoqin spaces which is defined as spaces for ceremony, rein and abode from the view point how the function of palace take effect by historical spatial classification. Thus the special traits of Chaoqin spaces in para-palaces as the main dominating and living spaces outside Forbidden City and the political, social and cultural roots of the spaces can be explicated.In the Introduction, the key words, the significant and the framework of the thesis are explained, and the present study situation and documentations are given as well.Chapter Two is focused on generalizing the developing process of palaces from Houjin to the late period of Qing dynasty. The author pays much attention to the para-palaces’ special position in the system of palaces and unveils the facts and reasons for the emperors’ remarkable long stay in the para-palaces. In Chapter Three, Chaoqin Spaces and their functions are discussed, and the spaces in Changchunyuan, Bishushanzhuang, Yanminyuan and Yiheyuan are analyzed in detail respectively to generalize the living routine of the emperors and the members of royal court and characters of each para-palaces.In Chapter Four, the author gives a comprehensive study by sorting Chaoqin spaces into courtyard style and tent style, and following research steps from building complex to courtyard, and then to individual building in order to clarify the characteristics of space patterns.Chapter Five, as a part on further discussion on loci-traits of para-palaces, contents studies connecting ceremonial, reining and living spaces with personal natures of emperors.In Chapter Six, culture essence of Chaoqin spaces is sought from three aspects including hierarchical order versus natural spirit, glorious sight versus plainness and simplification, and the culture of Han nationality versus that of Man nationality.Chaoqin spaces in Yuanminyuan and Versailles, as examples of para-palaces of Chinese and western kingdom, are chosen in Chapter Seven. The comparison is made in order to find a position for spatial form and pattern of Chaoqin Spaces of Qing dynasty in the scope both historical and global.
